|
carranzafp
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: August 22, 2006, 11:45:45 PM » |
|
So my firmware was read after I hacked and it was named hacked.bin. I then flashed the stealth sectors (stealth-e.bin) To restore the sectors for a v47 drive (F: in Windows), would the commands be: firm e hacked.bin hacked-e.bin 47flash f hacked-e.bin 90033000 1000 47flash f hacked-e.bin 90005000 1000then from GaryOPA's package, run: restore.batSound right?  Yep the commands are right
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carranzafp
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: August 22, 2006, 11:48:01 PM » |
|
Get the MS28 FW on your Sammy and you're having the same stealth protection
Can you bold it? Samsung MS28 Fw is is not un-readable so no stealth (I used to think that too). The only problem is that needs a specific timing to get readed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
klipseracer
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: August 22, 2006, 11:50:30 PM » |
|
This is GREAT progress! Please, KEEP IT COMMING!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sTix
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: August 23, 2006, 01:47:56 AM » |
|
So my firmware was read after I hacked and it was named hacked.bin. I then flashed the stealth sectors (stealth-e.bin) To restore the sectors for a v47 drive (F: in Windows), would the commands be: firm e hacked.bin hacked-e.bin 47flash f hacked-e.bin 90033000 1000 47flash f hacked-e.bin 90005000 1000then from GaryOPA's package, run: restore.batSound right?  Yep the commands are right Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
djbase
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: August 23, 2006, 04:02:11 AM » |
|
Get the MS28 FW on your Sammy and you're having the same stealth protection
Can you bold it? Samsung MS28 Fw is is not un-readable so no stealth (I used to think that too). The only problem is that needs a specific timing to get readed I think he meant it sarcastically... because the Samsung MS28 aren't that easy to flash!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DeadTermi
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: August 23, 2006, 12:27:12 PM » |
|
hi..i'm not understand who can I return to the NON stealth firmware??
i have to write 47flash g stealth-e.bin 90033000 1000??
if I write in this method..it says "fopen() failed"
help!!!
sorry for my english
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oscar4273
Newbie

Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: August 23, 2006, 02:15:01 PM » |
|
THI IS FANTASTY JOB.... NICE....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Abaddon
Newbie

Posts: 5
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: August 23, 2006, 04:48:18 PM » |
|
So my firmware was read after I hacked and it was named hacked.bin. I then flashed the stealth sectors (stealth-e.bin) To restore the sectors for a v47 drive (F: in Windows), would the commands be: firm e hacked.bin hacked-e.bin 47flash f hacked-e.bin 90033000 1000 47flash f hacked-e.bin 90005000 1000then from GaryOPA's package, run: restore.batSound right?  And if you don't have a hacked-e.bin yet but only the hacked.bin you get the encrypted one by using this command inside the tools dir firm.exe e hacked.bin hacked-e.binCorrect ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sTix
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: August 23, 2006, 05:54:49 PM » |
|
Yeah, that command is the first command in my original post. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
r1c4rd0
Newbie

Posts: 1
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: August 23, 2006, 06:55:56 PM » |
|
how to make drive on b method ?? is necessary any code to firmware my hitachi 47d ?? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The M.A.R.T.
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: August 30, 2006, 03:23:44 AM » |
|
Get the MS28 FW on your Sammy and you're having the same stealth protection
Can you bold it? Samsung MS28 Fw is is not un-readable so no stealth (I used to think that too). The only problem is that needs a specific timing to get readed You are right indeed after reading closer on MS28. The specific timing though is made by the VCC trick or 10 sec. switch off. How is MS gonna do that over Live? And I guess... someone is working on the stealth like it is on the Hitachi now also. And then it's done, the T/S is more save because there is no way to upload FW by MS like with the Hitachi
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carranzafp
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: August 30, 2006, 10:20:05 AM » |
|
Its gona be hard to implement firmware stealth on samsung, because the read/flash is handled by the built in circuitry on the Mediatek processor and not the firmware itself like on hitachi's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The M.A.R.T.
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: August 31, 2006, 04:45:11 AM » |
|
Its gona be hard to implement firmware stealth on samsung, because the read/flash is handled by the built in circuitry on the Mediatek processor and not the firmware itself like on hitachi's.
Could you explain a little bit more? It's hardware driven allright, but if the hardware read/flash is directed by the FW to give the results needed, wouldn't it be working also? Just thinking a bit too simple maybe but well. T/S would be the 'safest' drive then compared to the Hitachi where a new uploaded FW can be executed on the fly from inside the DVD drive. I hope you can explain a bit further, I try to understand
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
buzzar
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: August 31, 2006, 05:49:46 AM » |
|
/it only gets better thanx 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carranzafp
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: August 31, 2006, 10:31:47 AM » |
|
Well, I am not a hardware guru, so maybe somebody can give you a more indeepth answer. The Mediatek Controller has some services built in, one of them is programming/reading the external flash chip. Go to http://www.mtk.com.tw/product-lines.htm# and have a look at 1369 (wich is the more near I found to 1359 contained on the samsung drives for 360). Under HOST Microcontroller features: * Up to XX bytes FLASH Programming Interface That means, flash program interface handled by the Microcontroller, not the firmware In the case of the hitachi, the "panic" mode is handled also by the firmware, so if you try to flash a 100% blank chip on a Hitachi you will fail, but if you try to flash a 100% blank chip on a Samsung you will succed Also, I dont have any datasheet for the 1359 (anybody has it?, share with me).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The M.A.R.T.
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: August 31, 2006, 12:03:20 PM » |
|
Well, I am not a hardware guru, so maybe somebody can give you a more indeepth answer. The Mediatek Controller has some services built in, one of them is programming/reading the external flash chip. Go to http://www.mtk.com.tw/product-lines.htm# and have a look at 1369 (wich is the more near I found to 1359 contained on the samsung drives for 360). Under HOST Microcontroller features: * Up to XX bytes FLASH Programming Interface That means, flash program interface handled by the Microcontroller, not the firmware In the case of the hitachi, the "panic" mode is handled also by the firmware, so if you try to flash a 100% blank chip on a Hitachi you will fail, but if you try to flash a 100% blank chip on a Samsung you will succed Also, I dont have any datasheet for the 1359 (anybody has it?, share with me). We need some Uberfry here 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DjoeN
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: September 09, 2006, 04:46:17 PM » |
|
Starting after Fall, and in marketing push against the Sony PS3, you will see the x360's being sold before XMAS and after XMAS, containing a new DVD drive designed by the merger of BenQ and Lite-On. The only problem is that MS needs to have some type of flash device on the DVD drive, as they need to program it with your "drive key" themselfs, plus be able to update during the repair process. If they are smart they will use eeprom to store the "drive key" and have all the code in read-only non-writable memory.
If the do that, and our old x360 gets broken, then we are stuck with all those DL media  (we can use them as wallpaper in our room then  ) (i can already see old x360 with flashable dvd drives selling on ebay for much more value then in the stores if that happens)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Father, The Sleeper Has Awaken! He Who Controls The Spice, Controls The Universe!
|
|
|
m4v3rick
Newbie

Posts: 3
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: September 12, 2006, 01:39:25 AM » |
|
just a stupid question
when i dump my hitachi firmware and i get, for example, hitachi.bin, is this file encrypted or not?
just to know if i have to apply the stalth patch on an encrypted (or not) file
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The M.A.R.T.
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: September 12, 2006, 10:29:22 AM » |
|
Is there any progression on the T/S stealth FW or did that one is left out in the cold at this point in time?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|