|
rf1911
|
 |
« on: November 19, 2011, 05:12:50 AM » |
|
New CB 7375 is on new 14652 dash. CD is the same.
Now let's see if ms implemented something against rgh (2-3 or more cd checks, disable post out, obfuscation, etc etc)
Edit: Tested on fat. Slim should be ok.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 20, 2011, 03:03:53 AM by rf1911 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
miki4
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2011, 05:25:07 AM » |
|
Well, should not it be possible to reflash an old CB and glitch, though?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rf1911
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2011, 05:41:30 AM » |
|
No.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
miki4
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2011, 05:49:08 AM » |
|
Why not? Old CB is signed by MS and without any fuse checks.
Do I disregard something?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddxcb
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2011, 05:59:13 AM » |
|
New CB 7375 is on new 14652 dash. CD is the same.
Now let's see if ms implemented something against rgh (2-3 or more cd checks, disable post out, obfuscation, etc etc)
Is it a dual CB?, as long it can go Zero-pair mode, who cares? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I'm a ADD modder, got to mod or be bored xD
|
|
|
|
rf1911
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2011, 06:32:34 AM » |
|
Only on slim. Im talking about fats (didnt really specify it.. sorry). No dual cb.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rf1911
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2011, 03:43:05 PM » |
|
False alarm due to an updated xenon with refurb CB. I was a bit in a hurry and didnt dump the nand before upgrading, and assumed that since i never saw a 7375 cb... Thanx to COZ for pointing me that...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddxcb
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2011, 04:21:06 PM » |
|
Only on slim. Im talking about fats (didnt really specify it.. sorry). No dual cb.
Fats can have Dual CB. Not just for slims. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I'm a ADD modder, got to mod or be bored xD
|
|
|
|
rf1911
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2011, 05:03:44 PM » |
|
Yeah, right, but i was talking about the no cb split in the false alarm.. The only thing i can tell now is that this xenon has 7375, i never ever saw such CB. It could be new with this update or could have been there.. i really had no reason to dump before, xenon arent glitchable at this time, so it was really pointless.. that drove me to possible wrong conclusions...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rf1911
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2011, 03:03:25 AM » |
|
Tested on jasper. No CB change. Still 6750 using 14692!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
galo911
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2011, 08:01:00 AM » |
|
Maybe they have different betas going around... C4 and the team confirmed CB patch for the phat... It was beta 14.686, now you have a different number.
At least TX put a bombshell on their site saying C4 found a way to kill the new DAE/AP challenge in one shot and permanently.
Let's wait...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rf1911
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2011, 08:12:35 AM » |
|
Unless they didnt change the revision and just patched something, cb is still 6750 and update sequence is stil 01070050.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 20, 2011, 08:18:49 AM by rf1911 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
galo911
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2011, 08:21:04 AM » |
|
Try glitching it from new dumps ;Ds
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM